Skip to Main Content
PierceLibraryLogo

Post Election 2024 Resource Guide

Protecting your Reproductive Rights

Trump policies Threaten Birth Control Access in U.S. and Abroad

From Forbes

A recent decline in teen pregnancy rates was largely due to increased use of birth control. (Getty)

"The Trump administration is taking steps to limit family planning services both domestically and internationally. When the most drastic Medicaid cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act take effect at the end of next year and Affordable Care Act premium subsidies expire at the end of 2025, many low-income American women of reproductive age could lose access to birth control along with other health services.

"Specific actions include an initial rollback of Title X funding for family planning, the firing of a CDC team that oversees and updates guidance on contraceptive options for doctors, and the blocking of Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood. The abrupt shutdown of USAID ends U.S. support for a broad range of global health programs, including family planning. Rather than distribute or sell a stockpile of contraceptive products purchased for women and girls in low-income countries, the administration plans to destroy it. As unintended pregnancies rise, so will rates of maternal and infant mortality and healthcare spending."


'Complete Chaos': How Trump is Already Accelerating the Reproductive Rights Crisis

From Salon.com

A graphic of Donald Trump in front of pro-choice protesters in front of the U.S. Supreme Court

 

“Now [Trump] has spent his first week in office handing down anti-abortion directives gutting federal protections,” Timmaraju said. “These policies inflict harm on those who need access to reproductive health care, including abortion, in our country, and around the world.”

Indeed, the effects of these executive orders won’t only be felt in the U.S. but globally. As detailed by Guttmacher Institue, the first Trump administration’s Global Gag Rule expansions had “devastating” impacts internationally, such as decreasing access to abortion and contraceptive care. It also created a “chilling” effect among clinicians who were scared to share family-planning resources due to a fear of it affecting funding."


A Second Trump Presidency: A Dangerous Time for Reproductive Health

From the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy at Harvard Law School

An image of multiple arms and hands reaching upwards towards a blue symbol of a uterus

"The first few weeks of the Trump administration have made it clear that civil rights and liberties of many Americans are at risk."


'Californian Votes Really Matter': What the Election Could Mean for Reproductive Health

From KQED News

Doctor sitting at a desk in front of a laptop

"Project 2025 — a detailed, 900-page policy agenda for the next Republican presidency authored and supported by Trump allies, former and current Trump staffers and his running mate JD Vance — has called for a national database where states would report abortions. Cohen described this proposal as “basically Big Brother.”

Project 2025 also aims to revive parts of the Comstock Act, a law from the late 1800s that bans the mailing of “obscene” items such as contraceptives. (The act faced intense criticism at the time and was restricted in 1930, but it was never fully repealed. Roe v. Wade overruled it, and when Roe v. Wade was overturned, the Biden administration said it would not apply the Comstock Act.)

“States like California and New York that have constitutional protections for abortion rights and reproductive health care in general … those become meaningless,” Cohen said. “Federal law will trump state protection.”

Another Trump term would mean he could appoint more conservative-leaning Supreme Court justices and federal judges. In states like Alabama, Cohen noted, right-leaning judges have increasingly wielded arguments that personhood begins at conception.

“Something like that would outlaw the IUD,” she said."


Navigating threats to birth control and abortion during a second Trump administration

From Scientific American

A close up photo of an intra uterine device (IUD) held by a doctor or medical professional

“Researchers found a statistically significant increase in sterilization procedures nationwide in the immediate aftermath of the Dobbs decisionwhich overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion. The study also found that states with abortion restrictions continued to show higher rates of sterilization six months later. Other research has shown increases in long-acting reversible contraception use and sterilization procedures since Dobbs. These measures can prevent pregnancy for years at a time or for the rest of someone’s life. They are also less prone to failure than a daily pill and other short-term and temporary contraception.

“The results of the 2024 election appear to have further amplified this interest: reports from Planned Parenthood, which provides family planning and other reproductive health services, suggest sharp increases in appointments for vasectomies, IUDs and birth control implants at centers nationwide.” 

 


Project 2025 plans to order California to report abortion data or lose billions in Medicaid

From Jefferson Public Radio / CalMatters

Three people standing in front of a Project 2025 booth

"California is one of only three states that do not report abortion data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Project 2025’s proposed federal mandate directly conflicts with the state’s strong protections for patient privacy and could dismantle the legal and ethical foundations that have made California a refuge for those seeking reproductive care.

The blueprint, crafted by Donald Trump allies and leaders in his first administration, clearly targets states with abortion protections like California, seeking the kind of data that could be used to target abortion-seekers or even criminally punish out-of-staters who come to the state for reproductive health services."